Skip to main content
POST
Unico IDCloud biometric validation: matches the user’s selfie against the face on record for their CPF and returns whether it is the same person, not the same person, or inconclusive. Didit exposes this service through POST /v3/database-validation/ so you can verify the submitted data against the authoritative source and receive normalized match results.

Coverage

  • Coverage: 96%
  • Country: Brazil
  • Service ID: bra_unico_idcloud
  • Data domain: Identity
  • Category: BiometricRiskScore
About 96% of Brazilian CPF holders resolve to a biometric record in Unico’s registry — roughly double the reach of the government face-match source, Datavalid, at about 50%.

Inputs

  • Required inputs: tax_number, selfie
  • Optional inputs: first_name, last_name, full_name, date_of_birth, vendor_data
  • Consent: Required
  • Workflow availability: Available in workflow
  • Coverage: 96%
  • Price: $0.20 per successful query

Body parameters

string
default:"BRA"
required
ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 country code for this database service.Example: BRA
string
default:"bra_unico_idcloud"
required
Array containing this service ID. Pinning the service keeps the request scoped to this exact database.Example: bra_unico_idcloud
Explicit end-user consent for this service.Example: true
string
default:"11111111111"
required
Tax or fiscal identification number.Example: 11111111111
file
required
Selfie image file to upload for biometric database validation. Accepted formats: JPEG, PNG, or WebP.Example: @./selfie.jpg
string
default:"John"
Given name to validate.Example: John
string
default:"Doe"
Family name to validate.Example: Doe
string
default:"John Doe"
Full legal name to validate.Example: John Doe
string
default:"1990-01-01"
Date of birth in YYYY-MM-DD format.Example: 1990-01-01
string
default:"user-1234"
Your stable user reference for this person, such as your internal user ID. Didit uses it to link standalone checks to the same end user and reduce duplicate-detection noise.Example: user-1234

Input rules & validation notes

  • Brazilian CPF (exactly 11 digits)
  • tax_number must contain digits only; remove spaces, hyphens, and punctuation before sending the request.
  • tax_number must be exactly 11 characters long.

How to call it

Returned data

The exact fields surfaced in source_data depend on what the registry returns. The generated example for bra_unico_idcloud currently documents this normalized shape:
  • unico_face_match

Pricing & SLAs

BRA - Unico IDCloud (CPF + selfie) queries are billed only when Didit receives a conclusive result from the validation source.
  • Per-call price: $0.20 USD.
  • Billing: per successful query. You are not charged when the registry is unreachable, when required fields are missing, or when the request is rejected before reaching the source.
  • Latency: typical p95 < 2 s.
  • Availability: 99.9% per quarter on Didit’s side; downstream source availability varies by country and dataset.

About this source

Unico is a Brazilian IDtech that runs the country’s largest private facial-biometric registry. Its IDCloud platform holds more than a billion facial embeddings and adds roughly 35 million new faces every month, fed by the onboarding and re-authentication flows of over 800 Brazilian companies — including four of the five largest banks. That scale is what produces the coverage figure above: a CPF lookup resolves to a biometric record for about 96% of Brazilian adults. Didit has a direct partnership with Unico, so you can query IDCloud through the standard Database Validation API — pay-per-call, with no separate Unico contract, no minimum volume, and no onboarding process. How this differs from the government registry. Didit also offers Brazil - CPF + face match (Datavalid), which is the official SERPRO source and the right choice when you specifically need the government registry as your source of truth. IDCloud is the stronger choice for everything else, on two axes you can check: it reaches about 96% of adults against Datavalid’s roughly 50%, and it matches against a biometric record the registry maintains itself rather than a portrait taken from a document the user hands you — so it resists both document forgery and stolen-CPF fraud. It is also less than half the price per query. For most Brazilian use cases you do not need document capture at all. The user gives you a CPF, and a liveness-checked selfie confirms they are the person behind it.
1

Collect the CPF

Your only text input is the 11-digit CPF — no document photo, and no manually typed name or date of birth.
2

Capture the selfie with a liveness check

Add a liveness step to the same workflow and pick the method that matches your risk appetite — Passive Liveness (no user action at all), 3D Flash, or 3D Action & Flash (active methods that project light patterns, the last one adding a randomized action). Set it with face_liveness_method (PASSIVE, FLASHING, or ACTIVE_3D) in the Business Console or through the workflows API. Whichever you pick, Didit renders the capture step and confirms a real, present person — this is what stops a stored photo or a screen replay from being submitted.
3

Validate the CPF and selfie against Unico IDCloud

Inside a session flow Didit re-uses the liveness selfie automatically — you never handle the image. IDCloud then confirms whether that face belongs to the person the CPF belongs to.
This CPF-only flow applies to session and workflow integrations, where Didit performs the capture and passes the liveness selfie to this service for you. If you call POST /v3/database-validation/ directly, selfie is a required file input and you supply the image yourself — see Database Validation overview for both modes.
Cost: about $0.30 per verified user with Passive Liveness — $0.20 for the IDCloud query plus $0.10 for the liveness check — or about $0.35 with an active method, where the liveness check costs $0.15. Liveness includes a free monthly tier, so early volume costs less; see pricing. Fallback for the roughly 4% without coverage. When IDCloud returns INCONCLUSIVE, the registry could not resolve that CPF to a usable biometric record — typically because the person is not in it. Treat this as “no answer” rather than a failed check, and fall back to full ID Verification: document capture plus face match against the document portrait. Everyone stays verifiable, and you pay for document verification only on the small remainder. Handling declines. BIOMETRIC_NO_MATCH means the registry actively disagreed — the face does not belong to that CPF. Treat it as a strong negative rather than a prompt to retry: sending the user straight to document capture is exactly the path an impostor wants, since the document is the artefact they control. Genuine false negatives do happen, though — a changed appearance, an old registry photo, or a poor capture — so route these to manual review instead of either auto-approving or dead-ending the user. BIOMETRIC_IMAGE_UNUSABLE is different: the selfie simply could not be read, so ask for a fresh one. Decide what each result does to the session with Partial Match / No Match actions, and see Outcome Codes for the full list. Returning users. You only need to pay for a registry lookup once. After a user passes this flow, the liveness selfie is stored against their vendor_data, so you can re-verify them later with Biometric Authentication — a liveness check plus a face match against that stored face — for $0.10, with the same choice of liveness methods. Note that this is for returning users specifically: a biometric-authentication session needs a stored face (or a portrait_image you supply) and fails at creation if the user has neither, so first-time users still go through the flow above.

Continue reading